<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Small Business Law Blog - Latest Comments</title><link xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="http://api.friendfeed.com/2008/03#sup" href="http://disqus.com/sup/all.sup#forumcomments-dd0d0e48" type="application/json"/><link>http://business-law.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="http://business-law.disqus.com/comments.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:31:44 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: When does a tweet become a contract? the $1 million dollar reward</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2011/11/28/when-does-a-tweet-become-a-contract-the-1-million-dollar-reward/#comment-374919328</link><description>Thank you very much for visiting my site and commenting.  I agree; he has the money and paying is the right thing to do. Shame on him for misleading his fans.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 29 Nov 2011 10:31:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: When does a tweet become a contract? the $1 million dollar reward</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2011/11/28/when-does-a-tweet-become-a-contract-the-1-million-dollar-reward/#comment-374655313</link><description>Wow, amazing post Sharmil! Your credentials are awesome, and I completely agree with your take on Leslie. He's knows the power of twitter and he promised a figure he most likely has.  If he would have promised something like a gajillion dollars no one would have taken him seriously. 1 million? He better get his signing pen ready. &lt;a href="http://deadcomet.com" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://deadcomet.com&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Jill Sango</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:50:36 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: We need a Marketing Assistant</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2011/08/22/we-need-a-marketing-assistant/#comment-296094520</link><description>Update:  We hired a marketing assistant.  Her name is Jessica Smith.  We will post her bio in a few weeks.  We found her through LinkedIn.  So excited.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 15:11:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bishop Long&amp;#8217;s Sex Assault Lawsuit: will he lose?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/10/14/bishop-longs-sex-assault-lawsuit-will-he-lose/#comment-214934047</link><description>New Update: The parties have settled the lawsuit out of court.  The parties are not discussing the terms of the settlement agreement. CBS News is reporting that "Long paid off the four young men who accused him of using his power to influence them into sexual relationships with him". &lt;a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504083_162-20066740-504083.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-50...&lt;/a&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bishop Long did not discuss the case or the settlement agreement during Sunday's sermon.  &lt;a href="http://www.christianpost.com/news/eddie-long-speaks-to-church-after-lawsuit-settlement-50635/" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.christianpost.com/n...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And the plaintiffs' attorney has said "I will not discuss the settlement now or in the future".  Several people have speculated about this settlement will impact the church.  We know that Reverend King, the daughter of Martin Luther King is leaving the church. &lt;a href="http://www.clarionledger.com/article/20110531/NEWS03/110531013/Bishop-Long-says-King-leaving-megachurch?odyssey=tab" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.clarionledger.com/a...&lt;/a&gt;|topnews|text|Home</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 31 May 2011 14:30:15 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Bishop Long&amp;#8217;s sex case in mediation</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2011/02/06/bishop-longs-sex-case-in-mediation/#comment-193076769</link><description>UPDATE: The judge in this Long suit told the media that the parties are very close to settling the claims, after several marathon mediation sessions.  Here is the story &lt;a href="http://www.ajc.com/news/judge-long-suit-close-921527.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;http://www.ajc.com/news/judge-...&lt;/a&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 22:12:01 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will and Jada Smith head off lawsuit: explaining declaratory judgments</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/19/will-and-jada-smith-head-off-lawsuit-explaining-declaratory-judgments/#comment-192455017</link><description>hey Sharmil,  What exactly is a "licensed business attorney"?  Sounds pretty official.   Never heard of that before.  Is that different from the kind of attorney that i am?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TonyD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:10:37 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will and Jada Smith head off lawsuit: explaining declaratory judgments</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/19/will-and-jada-smith-head-off-lawsuit-explaining-declaratory-judgments/#comment-192454806</link><description>i heard the smiths paid Grasso millions to go away because they knew they would loose if he sued them.  Hey Super business attorney Sharmil, why dont you update your readers on that status of the smiths case.....   And Pamela... "other projects are under investigation" you say?  like what projects?  under investigation by whom?  you have no idea what you are talking about.  245 tenth avenue was taken out of foreclosure by grasso and he settled with that bank i heard. This Blog is a joke!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">TonyD</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 00:09:47 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can family members serve together on the same board of directors of a church?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2008/09/19/can-family-members-serve-together-on-the-same-board-of-directors-of-a-church/#comment-130633110</link><description>Sharmil:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;How about a situation where a church family member is related to the Pastor of the church and votes concerning the Pastor's salary and benefits?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Wayne D.</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:13:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Twitter Weekly Updates for 2010-12-19</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/12/19/twitter-weekly-updates-for-2010-12-19-2/#comment-129416666</link><description>&lt;a href="http://www.debtserviceuk.com/category/debt-solutions-uk" rel="nofollow"&gt;Debt Collecting&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is good site for every one.because the nice matter and best information in this site.&lt;br&gt;   so ..visits the site</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michaljn007</dc:creator><pubDate>Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:34:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will and Jada Smith head off lawsuit: explaining declaratory judgments</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/19/will-and-jada-smith-head-off-lawsuit-explaining-declaratory-judgments/#comment-128559722</link><description>Wah...it's great..</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Massachusetts Foreclosure</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 03:44:40 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Jill Scott Sued by Record Label: defending contract lawsuits</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/04/jill-scott-sued-by-record-label-defending-contract-lawsuits/#comment-67927937</link><description>Great post!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Business Attorney</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:52:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: My business partner is stealing from my company? What can I do?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/11/12/my-business-partner-is-stealing-from-my-company-what-can-i-do/#comment-52223300</link><description>partner is using business account for personal use and has also electronicly deposited money in company name into personal account. i am 40% owner he is 60% owner, i got loans to start up and business would pay them back and i wold receive compensation for this, well loan still being paid but no comp. and he is still payin himself, also took a title loan on a company truck and paid himself. What should i do as don want to be involved because of the tax nightmare he is creating, and i would like to get my loan paid off quicker then the minimum payments. trucks were to be used as collateral for loans(agreement throug lawyer) but they arent worth loan payoff. Can i hold him personaly responsible since he is using business accoun for personal use.?</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mark</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2010 09:09:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to collect a judgment in Pennsylvania</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/06/23/how-to-collect-a-judgment-in-pennsylvania/#comment-50032920</link><description>At final you observe when once the final judgement and costs of collecting the judgement are paid, you will need to file a Satisfaction of Judgement with the court so that the judgement is no longer officially outstanding.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">law advice</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 00:56:45 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Event: Free Business Advice and Counseling</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/01/27/event-free-business-advice-and-counseling/#comment-49890813</link><description>Good to see your profile and its good to know about your counselling services.I am a legal adviser and had adviced many peoples in legal matters and other legal anomalies.Am trying to focus on of your some point points which i get valuable.Thanks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">law advice</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 09:07:02 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to collect a judgment in Pennsylvania</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/06/23/how-to-collect-a-judgment-in-pennsylvania/#comment-49050130</link><description>No problem. Thank you for visiting. 
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;Sharmil McKee</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 22:38:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to collect a judgment in Pennsylvania</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/06/23/how-to-collect-a-judgment-in-pennsylvania/#comment-48988017</link><description>thank you for this very informative post and thank for sharing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greenwayberns</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 15:05:49 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to collect a judgment in Pennsylvania</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/06/23/how-to-collect-a-judgment-in-pennsylvania/#comment-48954851</link><description>thank you for this very informative post and thank for sharing</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greenwayberns</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 12:24:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: How to collect a judgment in Pennsylvania</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/06/23/how-to-collect-a-judgment-in-pennsylvania/#comment-48539333</link><description>This is a great post, thank you for sharing.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">greenwayberns</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 14:47:59 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will and Jada Smith head off lawsuit: explaining declaratory judgments</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/19/will-and-jada-smith-head-off-lawsuit-explaining-declaratory-judgments/#comment-48517352</link><description>Fascinating.  I call it buyer's remorse; the court doesn't give us relief for buyer's remorse.  &lt;br&gt;Thanks for the update about the foreclosure proceedings. &lt;br&gt; Sharmil McKee&lt;br&gt;Business Attorney&lt;br&gt;sm@mckeeoffice.com</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Sharmil McKee</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 12:18:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Will and Jada Smith head off lawsuit: explaining declaratory judgments</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/19/will-and-jada-smith-head-off-lawsuit-explaining-declaratory-judgments/#comment-48508182</link><description>Thanks Sharmil.  I would also note that Mr. David Grasso is a highly sophisticated businessman who clearly knew what he was doing and the risks involved.  I doubt the Smith’s convinced him to do anything.  I have heard that he courted them for months, desperately wanting to produce the project and become a “player” in Hollywood.  In addition he has an insidious reputation in his day job as a real estate developer.  He is currently in foreclosure by Citibank on his latest development in NYC “245 10th Ave” and other projects are under investigation.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Pamela</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 11:21:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do we need a conflict of interest policy?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/01/31/why-do-we-need-a-conflict-of-interest-policy/#comment-48459973</link><description>In my career as a business lawyer in a Canadian &lt;a href="http://www.compellingcounsel.com/" rel="nofollow"&gt;law firm (Ottawa, Ontario)&lt;/a&gt;, charitable organizations are seldom scrutinized by others due to the nature of the organization, but others think that some of these institutions are just a ploy of formal business organizations to evade paying taxes to the government. I hope that an &lt;a href="http://www.compellingcounsel.com/asserting_rights/physical_injuries.php" rel="nofollow"&gt;injury lawyer (Ottawa)&lt;/a&gt; in our law firm who works for this so-called charitable organizations would discover and solve this scenario. &lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Roan Price</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 05 May 2010 03:03:24 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Pennsylvania&amp;#8217;s Right to Know Law</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/12/05/pennsylvanias-right-to-know-law/#comment-46901291</link><description>i think most of people visit and stay in this site!</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">public records</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 06:18:18 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Why do we need a conflict of interest policy?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/01/31/why-do-we-need-a-conflict-of-interest-policy/#comment-45624494</link><description>It is really important for a business or an organization to have one good &lt;a href="http://www.larsenlawoffices.com/attorneyprofile.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;small business lawyer Denver&lt;/a&gt;, Colorado has or a &lt;a href="http://www.larsenlawoffices.com/firmoverview.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;lawyer in Denver for contracts&lt;/a&gt; for example to spare a business from legal problems especially. That's difficult to handle.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">BobGolden </dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 02:59:32 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Seminar: Google Makes Life Easy &amp;#8211; Mar 17th</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2010/02/28/seminar-google-makes-life-easy-mar-17th/#comment-37392699</link><description>I'm excited to talk with everyone on the 17th.</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Shawn Hickman</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 20:17:44 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Can someone steal my domain name?</title><link>http://mckeeoffice.com/blog2/2009/08/05/can-someone-steal-my-domain-name/#comment-30217881</link><description>Anything is possible indeed. For other users out there, careful when you buy a &lt;a href="http://www.123-reg.co.uk/domain-names/" rel="nofollow"&gt;domain name&lt;/a&gt;, check it first to see how old it is, the owner and it's availability. Don't get tricked.&lt;br&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Frank C. Tannehill</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 18 Jan 2010 09:50:04 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>
